Learning objectives
- Understand ggplot2’s grammar of graphics
- Apply the grammar to create a variety of plots including scatter plots, box plots and histograms
- Learn about how R handles categorical data
In this session we will focus our attention on the popular ggplot2 package for visualizing tabular data and will be learning how to create various different kinds of plot.
We’ll be using an extended version of the METABRIC data set (from last week) in which columns have been added for the mRNA expression values for selected genes, including estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1), progesterone receptor (PGR), GATA3 and FOXA1.
The METABRIC study characterized the genomic mutations and gene expression profiles for over 2000 primary breast tumours. In addition to the gene expression data generated using microarrays, genome-wide copy number profiles were obtained using SNP microarrays and targeted sequencing was performed using a panel of 40 driver-mutation genes to detect mutations (single nucleotide variants).
Curtis et al., Nature 486:346-52, 2012
Pereira et al., Nature Communications 7:11479, 2016
Both the clinical data and the gene expression values were downloaded from cBioPortal.
These have been combined into a single table using techniques we will cover later in the course. We’ve removed observations for patient tumour samples for which expression data are not available, so our table has fewer rows.
In addition, we have replaced spaces in column names with underscores
so we don’t have to constantly refer to these using backticks (
`
). Note, however, that even after
renaming some of the column names, we have one column, ‘3-gene
classifier’, that is not strictly a valid name in R as it starts with a
number and contains a hyphen. Valid names for variables in R contain
only letters, numbers and the dot (.
) and
underscore (_
) characters and should not
begin with a number. So when we refer to the ‘3-gene classifier’ column
we’ll have to use backticks,
e.g. metabric$`3-gene_classifier`
.
library(tidyverse)
metabric <- read_csv("data/metabric_clinical_and_expression_data.csv")
metabric
## # A tibble: 1,904 × 32
## Patient_ID Cohort Age_at_diagnosis Survival_time Survival_status Vital_status
## <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
## 1 MB-0000 1 75.6 140. LIVING Living
## 2 MB-0002 1 43.2 84.6 LIVING Living
## 3 MB-0005 1 48.9 164. DECEASED Died of Dis…
## 4 MB-0006 1 47.7 165. LIVING Living
## 5 MB-0008 1 77.0 41.4 DECEASED Died of Dis…
## 6 MB-0010 1 78.8 7.8 DECEASED Died of Dis…
## 7 MB-0014 1 56.4 164. LIVING Living
## 8 MB-0022 1 89.1 99.5 DECEASED Died of Oth…
## 9 MB-0028 1 86.4 36.6 DECEASED Died of Oth…
## 10 MB-0035 1 84.2 36.3 DECEASED Died of Dis…
## # ℹ 1,894 more rows
## # ℹ 26 more variables: Chemotherapy <chr>, Radiotherapy <chr>,
## # Tumour_size <dbl>, Tumour_stage <dbl>, Neoplasm_histologic_grade <dbl>,
## # Lymph_nodes_examined_positive <dbl>, Lymph_node_status <dbl>,
## # Cancer_type <chr>, ER_status <chr>, PR_status <chr>, HER2_status <chr>,
## # HER2_status_measured_by_SNP6 <chr>, PAM50 <chr>, `3-gene_classifier` <chr>,
## # Nottingham_prognostic_index <dbl>, Cellularity <chr>, …
First we’ll create a simple scatter plot much like the ones we’ve
created in previous sessions using R’s plot()
function.
We’ll plot the expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) against that
of the transcription factor, GATA3.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1))
We specified 3 things to create this plot:
In this case, the type of plot is a
geom_point
, ggplot2’s function for a
scatter plot, and the expression of the genes GATA3 and ESR1 (estrogen
receptor alpha) are mapped to the x
and
y
coordinates, i.e. the positions of
points on the scatter plot.
Other aesthetics include the size, shape and colour of the points. It might seem a little surprising that the x and y coordinates are treated in the same way as we wouldn’t normally think about these as having aesthetic qualities but this is indeed the case with ggplot2.
Look up the geom_point
help page to see the list of
aesthetics that are available for this geom.
?geom_point
If you scroll down to the aesthetics section in the help page for
geom_point
, you’ll see that the
x
and y
aesthetics are in bold face which tells us that these are required,
i.e. you have to supply them, otherwise you’ll get an error message from
ggplot.
Other aesthetics such as size, shape, colour and transparency
(alpha
) are optional.
So what about those other aesthetics? Colours are usually fun – let’s
try to use the colour
aesthetic.
We need to map a variable to a colour just like we did for x and y. We’ll use the ER status as an example.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = ER_status))
What about colouring points based on a continuous variable?
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = Nottingham_prognostic_index))
ggplot2 uses a colour scale for a continous variable but discrete colours for discrete or categorical values.
Size is not usually a good aesthetic to map to a variable. This is particularly the case where we have such a large number of observations.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, size = ER_status))
## Warning: Using size for a discrete variable is not advised.
Some aesthetics, such as size, are designed to be used with continuous variables. If you map these to a discrete variable as we have done here, then ggplot warns you that this isn’t such a good idea.
It would however be useful to be able to decrease the size of the
points given that there are around 2000 in this data set. We can do so
by setting the size to a single value rather than mapping it to one of
the variables in the data set - this has to be done outside the
aesthetic mappings, i.e. outside the aes()
bit.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = Nottingham_prognostic_index), size = 0.5)
Some aesthetics can only be used with categorical variables, e.g. shape.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, shape = Survival_time))
Error: A continuous variable can not be mapped to shape
Here we set the shape based on the 3-gene classifier.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, shape = `3-gene_classifier`), size = 0.9)
## Warning: Removed 204 rows containing missing values (`geom_point()`).
Note that some of the patient samples have not been classified and ggplot has removed those points with missing values for the 3-gene classifier.
It is usually preferable to use colours to distinguish between different categories but sometimes colour and shape are used together where we want to show which group a data point belongs to in two different categorical variables.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = PAM50, shape = `3-gene_classifier`), size = 0.9)
## Warning: Removed 204 rows containing missing values (`geom_point()`).
Transparency can be useful when we have a large number of points as
we can more easily tell when points are overlaid, but like size, it is
not usually mapped to a variable and sits outside the
aes()
.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = `3-gene_classifier`), size = 0.75, alpha = 0.5)
Colours are more commonly used than shapes, sizes or transparency.
Virtually every aspect of the plots we’ve created can be customized. We will learn how to change the colours used as well as other display parameters later in the course.
The “gg” in ggplot2 stands for “grammar of graphics”. This grammar is a coherent system for describing and building graphs.
The basic template is given in the summary box below. This template can be used to create any of a wide range of graph types with ggplot2.
ggplot2 grammar of graphics
ggplot(data = <DATA>) +
<GEOM_FUNCTION>(mapping = aes(<MAPPINGS>))
ggplot()
creates the plot object.
Layers can be added by adding geoms such as geom_point()
using the +
operator that ggplot2 has overridden for this
purpose.
The range of geoms available in ggplot2 can be obtained by navigating
to the ggplot2 package in the Packages tab pane in RStudio (bottom
right-hand corner) and scrolling down the list of functions sorted
alphabetically to the geom_...
functions.
The METABRIC study redefined how we think about breast cancer by identifying and characterizing several new subtypes, referred to as integrative clusters. Let’s create a bar chart of the number of patients whose cancers fall within each subtype in the METABRIC cohort.
geom_bar
is the geom we need and it requires a single
aesthetic mapping of the categorical variable of interest to
x
.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster))
The dark grey bars are a big ugly - what if we want each bar to be a different colour?
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster, colour = Integrative_cluster))
Colouring the edges wasn’t quite what we had in mind. Look at the
help for geom_bar
to see what other aesthetic we should
have used.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster, fill = Integrative_cluster))
What happens if we colour (fill) with something other than the integrative cluster?
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster, fill = ER_status))
We get a stacked bar plot.
Note the similarity in what we did here to what we did with the scatter plot - there is a common grammar.
Let’s try another stacked bar plot, this time with a categorical variable with more than two categories.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster, fill = `3-gene_classifier`))
What if want all the bars to be the same colour but not dark grey, e.g. blue?
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster, fill = "blue"))
That doesn’t look right - why not?
You can set the aesthetics to a fixed value but this needs to be outside the mapping, just like we did before for size and transparency in the scatter plots.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster), fill = "blue")
Setting this inside the aes()
mapping told ggplot2 to
map the colour aesthetic to some variable in the data frame, one that
doesn’t really exist but which is created on-the-fly with a value of
“blue” for every observation.
You may have noticed that ggplot2 didn’t just plot values from our data set but had to do some calculation first for the bar chart, i.e. it had to sum the number of observations in each category.
Each geom has a statistical transformation. In the
case of the scatter plot, geom_point
uses the “identity”
transformation which means just use the values as they are, i.e. not
really a transformation at all. The statistical transformation for
geom_bar
is “count”, which means it will count the number
of observations for each category in the variable mapped to the x
aesthetic.
You can see which statistical transformation is being used by a geom
by looking at the stat
argument in the help page for that
geom.
There are some circumstances where you’d want to change the
stat
, for example if we already had count values in our
table.
counts <- tibble(
`3-gene_classifier` = c("ER-/HER2-", "ER+/HER2- High Prolif", "ER+/HER2- Low Prolif", "HER2+"),
count = c(290, 603, 619, 188)
)
counts
## # A tibble: 4 × 2
## `3-gene_classifier` count
## <chr> <dbl>
## 1 ER-/HER2- 290
## 2 ER+/HER2- High Prolif 603
## 3 ER+/HER2- Low Prolif 619
## 4 HER2+ 188
ggplot(data = counts) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = `3-gene_classifier`, y = count), stat = "identity")
Consider again the ggplot2 grammar:
ggplot(data = <DATA>) +
<GEOM_FUNCTION>(mapping = aes(<MAPPINGS>))
Why do we have the ggplot part and geom part joined by a “+” symbol?
The ‘+’ operator has been overridden by ggplot2 to add layers (geoms) and other components (scales, themes, etc.) to the plot.
We can have multiple geoms in the same plot. Each is a different layer.
Let’s create a plot with two geoms.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1)) +
geom_smooth(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1))
## `geom_smooth()` using method = 'gam' and formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'
What is geom_smooth()
doing? Look up
the help page.
Note that the shaded area surrounding blue line represents the standard error bounds on the fitted model.
It is important when breaking these ggplot statements across multiple
lines to ensure that the +
is at the end of the line so
that R knows you haven’t finished constructing your plot.
There is some annoying duplication of code used to create this plot.
We’ve repeated the exact same aesthetic mapping for both geoms. We can
avoid this by putting the mappings in the ggplot()
function
instead.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth()
## `geom_smooth()` using method = 'gam' and formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'
Let’s make the plot look a bit prettier by reducing the size of the
points and making them transparent. We’re not mapping size
or alpha
to any variables, just setting them to constant
values, and we only want these settings to apply to the points, so we
set them inside geom_point()
.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1)) +
geom_point(size = 0.5, alpha = 0.5) +
geom_smooth()
## `geom_smooth()` using method = 'gam' and formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'
Aesthetics set in the ggplot
function are treated as
global mappings for the plot and are inherited by all geoms added to the
plot.
Let’s say we still want to colour the points by ER status.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = ER_status)) +
geom_point(size = 0.5, alpha = 0.5) +
geom_smooth()
## `geom_smooth()` using method = 'gam' and formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'
Well, that wasn’t expected, although it’s pretty neat. We only wanted to apply the colour aesthetic to the points.
We can add the colour aesthetic to the geom_point()
function instead of as a global mapping in the ggplot()
function.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1)) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(colour = ER_status), size = 0.5, alpha = 0.5) +
geom_smooth()
## `geom_smooth()` using method = 'gam' and formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'
Or suppose you’ve spent a bit of time getting your scatter plot just
right and decide to add another layer but you’re a bit worried about
interfering with the the code you so lovingly crafted, you can set the
inherit.aes
option to FALSE
and set the
aesthetic mappings explicitly for your new layer.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = ER_status)) +
geom_point(size = 0.5, alpha = 0.5) +
geom_smooth(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1), inherit.aes = FALSE)
## `geom_smooth()` using method = 'gam' and formula = 'y ~ s(x, bs = "cs")'
Box plots are a particular favourite of Wednesday lunchtime seminars.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = ER_status, y = GATA3)) +
geom_boxplot()
See geom_boxplot
help to explain how the box and
whiskers are constructed and how it decides which points are outliers
and should be displayed as points.
How about adding another layer to display all the points?
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = ER_status, y = GATA3)) +
geom_boxplot() +
geom_point()
Ideally, we’d like these points to be spread out a bit. The
geom_point
help points to geom_jitter
as more
suitable when one of the variables is categorical.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = ER_status, y = GATA3)) +
geom_boxplot() +
geom_jitter()
Well, that’s a bit of a mess. We need to reduce the spread or jitter and make the points smaller and transparent.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = ER_status, y = GATA3)) +
geom_boxplot() +
geom_jitter(width = 0.3, size = 0.5, alpha = 0.25)
Displaying points in this way makes much more sense when we only have a few observations and where the box plot masks the fact, perhaps giving the false impression that the sample size is larger than it actually is. Here it makes less sense as we have very many observations.
Let’s try a colour aesthetic to also look at how estrogen receptor expression differs between HER2 positive and negative tumours.
ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = ER_status, y = GATA3, colour = HER2_status)) +
geom_boxplot()
The next type of plot we’re going to look at is a line plot. Line plots are a common visualization for time series data but we don’t have data of this kind in the METABRIC data set so we’ll turn our attention to a more topical data set.
Every day the UK Government presents a series of plots showing data relating to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Both the plots and the data are published on the Government’s website.
One of the plots shows the reduction in different types oftransport use over time in the UK in the week leading up to and since the lockdown restrictions were introduced in response to the pandemic.
Reading these data into R from the downloaded Excel spreadsheet
requires a bit more care as the spreadsheet contains multiple sheets and
each table has header lines and footnotes. The date column doesn’t have
a column heading, so in the code below we’ve skipped that row as well
and told read_excel()
what column names to use. We’ve also
given it a heads-up about which type of data are in each column. Look up
the help page for read_excel()
for more details about the
arguments we’ve used below.
We can download COVID-19 data using download.file()
function.
download.file(url="https://bioinformatics-core-shared-training.github.io/Bitesize-R/data/2020-04-26_COVID-19_Press_Conference_Data.xlsx",destfile = "data/2020-04-26_COVID-19_Press_Conference_Data.xlsx")
library(readxl)
transport_use <- read_excel("data/2020-04-26_COVID-19_Press_Conference_Data.xlsx",
sheet = "Transport use",
col_names = c("date", "transport_type", "percentage"),
col_types = c("date", "text", "numeric"),
skip = 4,
n_max = 186)
transport_use$percentage <- transport_use$percentage * 100
transport_use
## # A tibble: 186 × 3
## date transport_type percentage
## <dttm> <chr> <dbl>
## 1 2020-03-16 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 98
## 2 2020-03-17 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 89
## 3 2020-03-18 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 83
## 4 2020-03-19 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 82
## 5 2020-03-20 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 81
## 6 2020-03-21 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 73
## 7 2020-03-22 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 69
## 8 2020-03-23 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 69
## 9 2020-03-24 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 49
## 10 2020-03-25 00:00:00 All motor vehicles 42
## # ℹ 176 more rows
In this data set each row represents an observation of the current traffic volume for various modes of transport (motor vehicle, bus, train, etc.) since 16 March as a percentage of the volume measured during the first week of February.
So let’s get a feel for this data set. Firstly, what modes of transport are included and how many observations do we have for each?
table(transport_use$transport_type)
##
## All motor vehicles Bus (excl. London) National rail TfL - Bus
## 40 40 40 34
## TfL - Tube
## 32
We’ll focus solely on rail use to start with.
rail_use <- transport_use[transport_use$transport_type == "National rail", ]
rail_use
## # A tibble: 40 × 3
## date transport_type percentage
## <dttm> <chr> <dbl>
## 1 2020-03-16 00:00:00 National rail 77
## 2 2020-03-17 00:00:00 National rail 69
## 3 2020-03-18 00:00:00 National rail 59
## 4 2020-03-19 00:00:00 National rail 52
## 5 2020-03-20 00:00:00 National rail 44
## 6 2020-03-21 00:00:00 National rail 38
## 7 2020-03-22 00:00:00 National rail 35
## 8 2020-03-23 00:00:00 National rail 29
## 9 2020-03-24 00:00:00 National rail 24
## 10 2020-03-25 00:00:00 National rail 18
## # ℹ 30 more rows
There is something unfamiliar about the date
column that
needs some explanation. Let’s check the type and class of
date
.
typeof(rail_use$date)
## [1] "double"
class(rail_use$date)
## [1] "POSIXct" "POSIXt"
So the date
column is stored as a double and is a
suitable continuous variable for a line plot but it’s also got some
special properties, afforded to it by its POSIXct
class,
that allows it to be treated as a date.
The POSIXct
class is how R represents dates, where POSIX
is a standardization scheme in the world of computers, spanning multiple
operating systems and programming languages, and the ct
part stands for calendar time. We won’t go into the details here but
note that the numeric representation of a date, i.e. the
double
value, is the number of seconds since 1 January
1970. For example, the date in our first row is:
rail_use$date[1]
## [1] "2020-03-16 UTC"
as.double(rail_use$date[1])
## [1] 1584316800
We’re going to plot the volume of traffic on each date with each
measurement represented as a point on our graph and observations on
successive dates connected by a line. Looking at the geoms available in
ggplot2 (see the list of functions available for ggplot2 by navigating
to the ggplot2 package in the Packages tab in RStudio), it looks like
geom_line
is the one we need.
The aesthetics section in the help page for geom_line
tells us we need an x and y mapping. Our x aesthetic will be
date
and the y aesthetic will be
percentage
.
ggplot(data = rail_use) +
geom_line(mapping = aes(x = date, y = percentage))
We can return to our original transport_use
table
containing data for all transport modes and use another aesthetic,
e.g. colour, to plot a line for each.
ggplot(data = transport_use) +
geom_line(mapping = aes(x = date, y = percentage, colour = transport_type))
Another aesthetic available for geom_line
is
linetype
.
ggplot(data = transport_use) +
geom_line(mapping = aes(x = date, y = percentage, linetype = transport_type))
The geom for creating histograms is, rather unsurprisingly,
geom_histogram()
.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_histogram(mapping = aes(x = Age_at_diagnosis))
## `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
The warning message hints at picking a more optimal number of bins by
specifying the binwidth
argument.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_histogram(mapping = aes(x = Age_at_diagnosis), binwidth = 5)
Or we can set the number of bins.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_histogram(mapping = aes(x = Age_at_diagnosis), bins = 20)
These histograms are not very pleasing, aesthetically speaking - how about some better aesthetics?
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_histogram(mapping = aes(x = Age_at_diagnosis), bins = 20, colour = "darkblue", fill = "grey")
Several of the variables in the METABRIC data set are categorical, i.e. they can take one of a limited set of values. Some of these have been read into R as character types (e.g. the 3-gene classifier), other as numerical values, e.g. tumour stage. We also have some binary variables that are essentially categorical variables but with only 2 possible values, e.g. ER status.
In many of the plots given above, ggplot2 has treated character variables as categorical in situtations where a categorical variable is expected. For example, when we displayed points on a scatter plot using different colours for each 3-gene classification, or when we created separate box plots in the same graph for ER positive and negative patients.
But what about when our categorical variable has been read into R as
a continuous variable, e.g. Tumour_stage
, which is read in
as a double type.
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = Tumour_stage))
table(metabric$Tumour_stage)
##
## 0 1 2 3 4
## 4 475 800 115 9
Tumour stage has only 5 discrete states but ggplot2 doesn’t know these are supposed to be a restricted set of values and has used a colour scale to show them as if they were continuous. We need to tell R that these are categorical.
R has a special type for categorical variables called a
factor. Let’s convert our tumour stage variable to a
factor using the as.factor()
function.
metabric$Tumour_stage <- as.factor(metabric$Tumour_stage)
metabric[, c("Patient_ID", "Tumour_stage")]
## # A tibble: 1,904 × 2
## Patient_ID Tumour_stage
## <chr> <fct>
## 1 MB-0000 2
## 2 MB-0002 1
## 3 MB-0005 2
## 4 MB-0006 2
## 5 MB-0008 2
## 6 MB-0010 4
## 7 MB-0014 2
## 8 MB-0022 2
## 9 MB-0028 2
## 10 MB-0035 2
## # ℹ 1,894 more rows
R actually stores categorical variables as integers but with some additional metadata about which of the integer values, or ‘levels’, corresponds to each category.
typeof(metabric$Tumour_stage)
## [1] "integer"
class(metabric$Tumour_stage)
## [1] "factor"
levels(metabric$Tumour_stage)
## [1] "0" "1" "2" "3" "4"
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_point(mapping = aes(x = GATA3, y = ESR1, colour = Tumour_stage))
In this case the order of the levels makes sense but for other variables you may wish for more control over the ordering. Take the integrative cluster variable for example. We created a bar plot of the numbers of patients in the METABRIC cohort within each integrative cluster. Did you notice the ordering of the clusters? 10 came just after 1 and before 2. That looked a bit odd as we’d have naturally expected it to come last of all. R, on the other hand, is treating this vector as a character vector (mainly because of the ‘ER-’ and ‘ER+’ subtypes of cluster 4, and sorts the values into alphanumerical order.
metabric$Integrative_cluster <- as.factor(metabric$Integrative_cluster)
levels(metabric$Integrative_cluster)
## [1] "1" "10" "2" "3" "4ER-" "4ER+" "5" "6" "7" "8"
## [11] "9"
A look at the help page for as.factor
shows that we can
create a factor using the factor()
function and specify the
levels using the levels
argument.
metabric$Integrative_cluster <- factor(metabric$Integrative_cluster, levels = c("1", "2", "3", "4ER-", "4ER+", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10"))
levels(metabric$Integrative_cluster)
## [1] "1" "2" "3" "4ER-" "4ER+" "5" "6" "7" "8" "9"
## [11] "10"
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Integrative_cluster, fill = Integrative_cluster))
Let’s build a ggplot2 plot up in stages to understand what’s really going on.
plot <- ggplot(data = metabric)
What is the plot object we’ve just created?
typeof(plot)
## [1] "list"
length(plot)
## [1] 9
The plot object is a list containing 9 elements. It’s actually a special type of list.
class(plot)
## [1] "gg" "ggplot"
What are the 9 things in the list?
names(plot)
## [1] "data" "layers" "scales" "mapping" "theme"
## [6] "coordinates" "facet" "plot_env" "labels"
So far we’ve constructed ggplots from data, layers (geoms) and aesthetic mappings but do you notice the labels, scales, facet and theme elements? We’ll be looking at how to customize plots later, including changing the labels, altering the scales of axes, and applying a different visual theme.
The data
element is just the metabric tibble that we
provided to the ggplot()
function.
plot$data
## # A tibble: 1,904 × 32
## Patient_ID Cohort Age_at_diagnosis Survival_time Survival_status Vital_status
## <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <chr>
## 1 MB-0000 1 75.6 140. LIVING Living
## 2 MB-0002 1 43.2 84.6 LIVING Living
## 3 MB-0005 1 48.9 164. DECEASED Died of Dis…
## 4 MB-0006 1 47.7 165. LIVING Living
## 5 MB-0008 1 77.0 41.4 DECEASED Died of Dis…
## 6 MB-0010 1 78.8 7.8 DECEASED Died of Dis…
## 7 MB-0014 1 56.4 164. LIVING Living
## 8 MB-0022 1 89.1 99.5 DECEASED Died of Oth…
## 9 MB-0028 1 86.4 36.6 DECEASED Died of Oth…
## 10 MB-0035 1 84.2 36.3 DECEASED Died of Dis…
## # ℹ 1,894 more rows
## # ℹ 26 more variables: Chemotherapy <chr>, Radiotherapy <chr>,
## # Tumour_size <dbl>, Tumour_stage <fct>, Neoplasm_histologic_grade <dbl>,
## # Lymph_nodes_examined_positive <dbl>, Lymph_node_status <dbl>,
## # Cancer_type <chr>, ER_status <chr>, PR_status <chr>, HER2_status <chr>,
## # HER2_status_measured_by_SNP6 <chr>, PAM50 <chr>, `3-gene_classifier` <chr>,
## # Nottingham_prognostic_index <dbl>, Cellularity <chr>, …
This plot
list object is really only a specification for
how ggplot2 should create the plot. ggplot2 only renders the plot when
we ask it to by printing it out to the screen by typing
print(plot)
or simply just plot
.
We haven’t added any layers yet so what does our plot look like at this point?
plot
ggplot2 doesn’t know what to plot yet as we haven’t added a layer (geom).
plot$mapping
## Aesthetic mapping:
## <empty>
plot$layers
## list()
Lets add an aesthetic mapping.
plot <- ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = Nottingham_prognostic_index, y = ESR1, colour = ER_status))
plot
ggplot2 has automatically added scales for x and y based on the ranges of values for the Nottingham prognostic index and ESR1 expression. Still nothing has been plotted as we haven’t yet specified the type of plot (geom) to add as a layer.
plot$mapping
## Aesthetic mapping:
## * `x` -> `Nottingham_prognostic_index`
## * `y` -> `ESR1`
## * `colour` -> `ER_status`
plot$layers
## list()
Finally, let’s add a geom_point
layer to create a
scatter plot.
plot <- plot + geom_point()
plot
plot$layers
## [[1]]
## geom_point: na.rm = FALSE
## stat_identity: na.rm = FALSE
## position_identity
We touched on statistical transformations earlier. The
stat
associated with a geom_point
is
stat_identity
which leaves values unchanged. In the case of
a scatter plot, we already have the x and y values – they don’t need to
be transformed, just plotted on the x and y axes.
In this session we have covered the following concepts:
library(tidyverse)
metabric <- read_csv("data/metabric_clinical_and_expression_data.csv")
ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_bar(mapping = aes(x = Neoplasm_histologic_grade))
Use iris
data set to show the following
iris
data set.iris
data set, and display the mean and median values
as red and orange points within the box plot. Hint: use
stat_summary
function.# 2 a.
ggplot(data=iris, mapping = aes(x=Species, y= Petal.Length)) +
geom_boxplot()
# 2 b
ggplot(data=iris, mapping = aes(x=Species, y= Petal.Length)) +
geom_boxplot() +
stat_summary(fun=mean, color="red") +
stat_summary(fun=median, color="orange")
metabric
data set.ggplot(data = metabric) +
geom_density(mapping = aes(x = ESR1))
metabric
data set.ggplot(data = metabric, mapping = aes(x = FOXA1, y = MLPH)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth()